// DEVSECOPS· Specialty
Guardrails enforced at deploy time, not review time.
For teams relying on manual review to catch misconfigurations that a policy engine could block automatically.
The problem
Why this keeps biting teams
Security and platform teams often catch risky configurations in code review, if they catch them at all. That's a slow, inconsistent control compared to enforcement that happens automatically before anything reaches the cluster.
What we do
[01]
Define policy as code with Kyverno or OPA/Gatekeeper for the risks that matter most to you.
[02]
Roll out policies in audit mode first, then enforce once false positives are tuned out.
[03]
Cover the common failure modes: privileged containers, missing resource limits, public exposure.
[04]
Give teams a fast path to request policy exceptions without disabling enforcement entirely.
Typical Outcomes
automatic
enforcement, not manual review
blocked
at deploy time, not discovered in production
Deliverables
[01]
Policy-as-code implementation (Kyverno or OPA/Gatekeeper)
[02]
Policy set covering your highest-risk misconfiguration classes
[03]
Audit-to-enforce rollout with false-positive tuning
[04]
Exception request workflow for legitimate edge cases
More in DevSecOps
View Software supply chain security
[01] Software supply chain security
Software supply chain security
View Secrets & identity management
[02] Secrets & identity management
Secrets & identity management
View Compliance automation
[03] Compliance automation
Compliance automation
View Threat modeling & architecture review
[04] Threat modeling & architecture review
Threat modeling & architecture review
Stop guessing.
Start shipping.
Thirty minutes with a senior engineer. No sales deck, no junior SDRs. Just a technical conversation about what's actually breaking or slowing you down.