// DEVSECOPS· Specialty
Access reviews that take minutes, not a week of Slack archaeology.
For teams with secrets scattered across .env files, CI variables, and a wiki page marked 'do not share.'
The problem
Why this keeps biting teams
Secrets sprawl is almost universal: API keys in a dozen places, IAM roles nobody remembers granting, and an access review that means someone spending a week reconstructing who can touch what.
What we do
[01]
Centralize secrets in Vault or your cloud provider's KMS, out of source control and CI variables.
[02]
Redesign IAM around least privilege, replacing broad roles accumulated over time.
[03]
Set up automatic secret rotation for the credentials that matter most.
[04]
Build an access review process that's a report, not a research project.
Typical Outcomes
minutes
not days, for an access review
zero
secrets in source control
Deliverables
[01]
Centralized secrets management (Vault or cloud KMS)
[02]
Least-privilege IAM redesign
[03]
Automated secret rotation for critical credentials
[04]
Self-service access review reporting
More in DevSecOps
View Policy-as-code & admission control
[01] Policy-as-code & admission control
Policy-as-code & admission control
View Software supply chain security
[02] Software supply chain security
Software supply chain security
View Compliance automation
[03] Compliance automation
Compliance automation
View Threat modeling & architecture review
[04] Threat modeling & architecture review
Threat modeling & architecture review
Stop guessing.
Start shipping.
Thirty minutes with a senior engineer. No sales deck, no junior SDRs. Just a technical conversation about what's actually breaking or slowing you down.